Democratic Senators have just rallied 50 votes in a desperate bid to preserve net neutrality. But can they beat the FCC, entrenched Republicans, and Trump?
Google, Facebook, Netflix, Amazon, and dozens other tech giants are vowing to fight for net neutrality. But Democrats in the Senate are also waging a counter-fensive.
Just this morning, the group Democratic insurgents mustered the minimum votes necessary to potentially preserve net neutrality. Right now, Democrats control 49 seats in the Senate. By convincing Republican Susan Collins (R-Maine) to join their cause, the group has now rallied 50 votes.
+ Comcast, Cox, Frontier All Raising Internet Access Rates for 2018
That’s enough to pass a resolution against the FCC’s decision to repeal net neutrality. Importantly, a resolution cannot block legislation, though 51 votes can start the wheels on that process.
Right now, 50 votes is largely symbolic.
The reason is that Vice President Mike Pence has the power to decide ties in the Senate (it’s actually one the few things a Vice President the US has the power to do). That makes this resolution largely DOA, though one more vote puts a pro-neutrality bill in front the House — and makes this a much bigger deal.
Realistically, the Republican-controlled House would defeat the measure, leaving the FCC’s dismantling net neutrality intact. But Senate Democrats are sensing a serious campaign issue ahead, and are hoping to force Republicans to show their hand on the matter.
+ A Radically Different ISP Could Change the Net Neutrality Debate
Democrats are probably sniffing something big. Poll after poll indicate that voters overwhelmingly favor net neutrality, and resent the FCC’s backdoor repeals and heavy-handed ISP monopolies. In fact, the issue is so important that it could affect midterm elections, which might explain Collins’ decision to defect.
Just recently, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer noted that Democrats plan to make net neutrality a big part their midterm platform. So calling a vote is the perfect way to force Republican candidates to take a formal position against neutrality — and suffer the possible consequences.